본문바로가기

Wealth of Nations : The reality and future of cyberwar

Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace, 2008년 발간

세부항목 안내표
대분류 키워드 Time Horizon Quality Territorial Scope
Social cyberwar 없음 Recommand Global

Issue 보고서

요약

Conflicts in cyberspace are a reality: elements of any political, economic and military conflict now take place in and around the internet. Not surprisingly cyberwar has become a buzzword in the media and in the political debate. The term has come to refer to any phenomenon involving a deliberate disruptive or destructive use of computers. There also is a widespread tendency to hype the issue with rhetorical dramatization and alarmist warnings. True, cyber conflict might seem disconcerting and frightening, but the number one law in the cyberage is: don’t panic. The number two law: be precise in your use of language.  A conceptual distinction between different forms of conflict in cyberspace is necessary if we are to assess the risk and its possible consequences, to assign responsibility for addressing the conflict, but also to discuss the possibility and implementation of preventive and reactive countermeasures. Broad and imprecise use of the term cyberwar must be avoided — as should fear-based (over-)reactions.  Different forms of cyber conflict can be distinguished by focusing on the extent of damage and a cyberescalation ladder can be built with rungs expressed by ‘severity of effects’. This helps policy-makers to prioritize: only computer attacks whose effects are sufficiently destructive or disruptive are an issue that needs to be addressed at the political level. Attacks that disrupt non-essential services, or that are mainly a costly nuisance, are not. 

본문

- Cyber-escalation ladder 

- The other side of the coin: defensive measures 

- Cyberwar as strategic form of war of the future?

 

연관자료

연관자료 list
ID 제목 카테고리 Territorial Scope
연관자료 정보가 없습니다.